Determining the official rank or precedence of the stakeholders is to determine who is most important to us. Who ranks first, second, third? This determination is eventually used when a tailor-made protocol is developed and the rank is applied in, for example, the order of the flags, assigning the seats and the order of the speeches.
Order of precedence is a hierarchical ranking of primarily functions. In general, it does not rank individuals, but the bearers of a specific function. The precedence is determined in an objective way. For example, a head of state is the representative of all the inhabitants of a country and is therefore considered to be ‘more important’ than, for example, a mayor who ‘only’ represents the inhabitants of one city.
Determining the precedence is not an exact science. There are rules determining the rank among equals, among different groups and among individuals. The rules of precedence are often complementary, but sometimes they contradict each other. It requires some practice to deal with precedence and to be able to put officials in the correct order.
Protocol to Manage Relationships Today: Modern Relationship Management Based Upon Traditional Values (Amsterdam University Press, 2020) explains the value of protocol for non-profit and for-profit organisations. The book presents an innovative view of the value of protocol in our 21st century; a method to build strong networks of authentic reciprocal relationships.
Order the book here.
The rank among senior officials is described in so-called national lists of precedence. These lists determine the rank of the most important individuals in a country. Many of these and other examples of lists of precedence can be found online, however, some countries have not made their list public.
Although many differences exist between countries some general commonalities in ranking can be derived:
- Lists start with the head of state of a country.
- Followed by accredited foreign ambassadors to that country (as representative of their own head of state).
- Highest representatives of the church.
- Chairpersons of national parliaments (representing the voters).
- Followed by the members of the national cabinet starting with the prime minister (head of government), deputy prime ministers and other ministers.
- The list continues with senior officials of other important government institutions, such as the president of the supreme court and the president of the national court of audit.
- Further down on the list are other officials, such as senior regional representatives, governors and mayors.
- The lists also include first representatives of the police force, the courts and the universities.
Source: Protocol to Manage Relationships Today (Amsterdam University Press, 2020)
Other rules to determine the rank or precedence of officials
Groups of officials are ranked in the following order:
- Royalty.
- Diplomatic corps (ambassadors).
- Senior (elected) officials (politicians).
- Senior civil servants.
Among equal representatives rank also applies:
- The period of service (by seniority).
- Or the alphabet.
Rules to determine the rank outside government organisations
At corporate events the rank among guests is often determined by commercial goals:
- Large clients.
- Clients.
- Small clients.
This method uses annual revenue or profit to determine who is ‘large’ or ‘small’. Another option is:
- Oldest clients.
- Clients.
- Newest clients.
Source: Protocol to Manage Relationships Today (Amsterdam University Press, 2020)
